Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, August 23, 2022

Creation and its anthropomorphization

 

I believe in God, the father almighty, creator of heaven and earth.

In the manual laid down for us, tutoring us in relationship to this god, it says “I am the potter, you are the clay”. 

A potter grabs a lump of clay and throws it onto the wheel.  The clay has no idea of what it is meant to become.  The potter has the intention, the concept.

Whatever the Creator is, we its creation are incapable of fully knowing it.  Mercifully, it has spread seeds around in its garden to germinate into philosophies and theologies that create concepts simple enough for our minds to grasp.  The Hindu creator is a flame, with three main functions: creator, sustainer, destroyer.  Their theology recognizes a pantheon of gods who roamed the world in flesh, and that wield specific powers.  The Christian creator is an old man with a white beard sitting on a throne in clouds.  He operates through a unique creation, Jesus the Messiah. Those who successfully follow the ‘handbook’ go on to be recognized as ‘saints’, having realized while in the flesh more of the power of the spirit.  This Christ concept is composed of three functions:  Father, Son and Holy Spirit, or Creator, Destroyer, Sustainer.  Jesus is the destroyer in that He conquered, or destroyed, the power of death.  His teachings tell us to die to self and be reborn to the Spirit, the sustainer.  Those who somehow know not to anthropomorphize the creator call it, simply, the Source.

We live in a creation.  The Hindu word of samsara describes the illusionary nature of it.  It is a world of duality.  Opposites exist, and are the tension that moves us.  Good, bad, success, failure, up, down, angels, devils, alive or dead.  We are spirit in nature, whatever that means.  It is an ethereal concept; spirit has no physical manifestation.  Our fleshly shell obscures the perception of the spirit.  With work, we can thin the veil of obscuration to varying degrees.  At greatest density, we as children are drawn to tales of good, be they fairy tells or Bible stories.  We want to believe in good, unless we are born into a family where all good has died, and total obfuscation dominates.  Our culture leads us to a structured form meant to teach our spirit its true nature; religion.  Some of us are born with a long way to go, at the end leaving the shell behind having never leapt free of the structure.  Others seem to be born with a thinner veil.  It is easier to see the value in the spirit, and so we cultivate it more carefully; greater leaps of faith are possible.  And a rare few can throw the trace of veil off quickly, and live a life of awareness.  We mere mortals cannot conceive of life in that awareness, though we try.  In the presence of holy men, like the Pope or the Dalai Lama, the force of their consciousness can be felt.  A weakening in the knees, a light-headedness, or just a rare warm glow comes over us.  There is something there, and that reaction is probably as close to perceiving the spirit physically as we can come.

Negative stances over particular (or any) religions are a product of samsara. Love/hate duality does not exist in the purely spirit world.  It is interesting to watch Tyler Henry[1], a rare gifted soul, communicate between the two worlds.  Granted, what he is bringing us is a tiny picture of the whole of reality.  Nevertheless, it is clear that we drop this dualistic stance when we leave the flesh behind.  On ‘the other side’, the predominant perception is love.  Negative emotions fall away.

Knowing this, why do we cling so strongly to our love/hate dualistic reactions to what arises in our lives? Why do we allow the dross of this world, the mudslinging, the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune[2], to cling to us and toss us into tempests of negative thoughts and deeds? In Shakespeare’s words, it is nobility of mind that permits us to suffer negative blows, rather than react to them.  Is it suffering?  In Buddhism one learns a basic concept.  Suffering is at the root of samsara. They are commonly known as ‘The Four Noble Truths.’ Suffering is a constant to all life on earth.  It is our reaction to suffering that matters.  The causes of suffering are numerous, but boil down to clinging to the ego.  How I am perceived, how much I possess, what will bring me to success and its pursuit.  The third truth is the most difficult to perceive, that there is an end of suffering.  Once that is accepted, one must also accept the path that will lead to the end of suffering, wherever you may find that path.

We study meditation in its various forms to find the way out.  Meditation is not a Buddhist ‘thing’, it permeates all forms of spirituality.  In the Medieval text, The Cloud of Unknowing, Christianity finds deep roots in the monastic tradition of meditation.  Thomas Merton[3] has masterfully shown the East and the West that quieting the mind, dulling the dualistic pull of our nature, is at the core of the quest to know our spiritual nature.  This practice is universal, not confined to any one ‘religion’.  

We would not jump out of an airplane without a parachute strapped to our backs. We would tumble, be batted about by winds, and ultimately smashed by the force of gravity.  With our relatively ignorant human minds we would be equally at danger if we sought to know the creator by flying free.  The spirit world, while at its core is benevolent, nevertheless is fraught with negative forces that, for their own reasons, do not want us to find release into this Sea of Love, this freedom from suffering.  It is necessary to explore the many Paths out there, find the one you are most comfortable with, and stick with it.  None less than the Dalai Lama has said that it is not wise to mix Buddhism and Christianity.  Choose one and stick to it.  You will not be slammed by Buddha or Christ if you do, but rather the difficult path will be made muddier, more difficult, by trying to mix and match.

I have heard that Billy Graham said no religion is perfect, because all religions are manmade.  That is deep.

When I say that I am merely the steward of my life, my possessions, it is an acknowledgment that creation is, at its core, benevolent.  For your clarification, if I must further say ‘God’ gives me everything that I need, and all that I own comes from ‘him’, I am not ceding to the concept of an anthropomorphized source of creation.

I rest in the ‘arms’ of this benevolence.  Bad things happen, there is negative energy roaming this planet.  It is unreasonable that I am privileged to not know helpless poverty and violence, while so many good people know that suffering.  I do what I can to generate positive energy into the universe, express to the creator daily my deep gratitude, and pray that should such suffering befall me I will not be crushed, but will feel the eternal goodness under me like wings bearing me aloft.  I pray the same for you.

 



[1] Tyler Henry, born 1996, is a clairvoyant who allows his sessions with individuals to be videotaped and viewed on E! Television Network, as the Hollywood Medium.  Some interviews can also be seen on YouTube

[2] Shakespeare, Hamlet Act 3 Scene 1

[3] Thomas Merton, b. 1915, was an American Trappist monk and ordained Catholic priest.

No comments:

Post a Comment